Legal Opinion
Ross v. Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided August 4, 2011No. Civil No. PJM 10-3090PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETER J. MESSITTE, District Judge.
I
Daniel H. Ross, pro se, has sued the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (“ATFE”), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), and “Unknown Officials” of both agencies (collectively, “Defendants”), asserting various claims arising out of the so-called “appearance” of a felony murder conviction on his record. Defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss all counts, arguing that some fail to state a claim while, as to others, the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. [Paper No. 7]. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the employment…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Young v. HawaiiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
- Sutterfield v. City of MilwaukeeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2012
- Ross v. Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, & ExplosivesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Delaney v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
- El-Bey v. FranchotDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.