Legal Opinion
Alexander v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided May 27, 1940No. 35742PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PONDER, Justice.
The appellant has applied for an order to remand this case, in advance of the hearing of the appeal on its merits, to the lower court for the purpose of introducing and receiving testimony to contradict the testimony given by the plaintiff and his witnesses on the trial in the lower court. In support of the application, the appellant relies on Article 906 of the Code of Practice; Klopstock & Co. v. United Fruit Company, 171 La. 296, 131 So. 25, and Succession of Robinson, 186 La. 389, 172 So. 429.
Article 906, Code of Practice, provides: “But if the court shall think it' not…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Succession of RobinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
- Paul Klopstock & Co. v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Louisiana Ice Manufacturing Co. v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
- L. A. Frey & Sons, Inc. v. Town of SlidellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Culliver v. GarricSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1839
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Savin v. SavinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
- Stoufflet v. DuplantisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
- Alexander v. JacksonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
- Butler v. American Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Johnson v. HarperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957