Legal Opinion
Savin v. Savin
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided November 7, 1949No. 39352PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAWTHORNE, Justice.
Plaintiff-appellant, Dennis Savin, prior to the fixing or hearing of this case on its merits in this court, filed a motion to remand on the ground of newly discovered evidence which he alleges is material to the issues of ■the suit.
Under the law and the well established jurisprudence of this state, the motion at this time is premature. Code of Practice, Article 906; Louisiana Ice Manufacturing Co. v. City of New Orleans et al., 1891, 43 La.Ann. 217, 9 So. 21; L. A. Frey & Sons, Inc., v. Town of Slidell et ah, 1927, 173 La. 397, 137 So. 193; Mayer v. Barrow et al., 1935, 182…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mayer v. BarrowSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- Louisiana Ice Manufacturing Co. v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
- L. A. Frey & Sons, Inc. v. Town of SlidellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Alexander v. JacksonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
3Cited by8 opinions
- Herbert v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1970
- Savin v. SavinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
- Guilott v. GuilottLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- LaSalle Pump & Supply Co., Inc. v. LOUISIANA MIDLAND R.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
- Mid-City Investment Co. v. BatisteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.