Legal Opinion

McCormick v. Labelle

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided December 9, 1960No. Civil No. 8302PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMBERS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs move for judgment in this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by them as the result *454of an automobile accident which occurred on October 23, 1959 in Simsbury, Connecticut.

Pursuant to Rule 4(d), Fed.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., service of the summons and complaint was made on defendants through their agent, the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles of the State of Connecticut. Conn.Gen.Stat., ch. 896, § 52-62 (1958). Defendants failed to appear and failed to answer the summons and complaint. Pursuant to Rule 55(a), Fed. R.Civ.P., a default was entered…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pinel v. PinelSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Diepen v. FernowDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1940
  3. Mitchell v. Great American Indemnity Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1950
  4. Bell v. MykytiukDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Edelhertz v. MatlackDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1941

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eagle Star Insurance Company, Limited v. Augustin Maltes, Gilberto Perez, and Bernabe ArroyoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  2. Del Sesto v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1962
  3. Trio Process Corp. v. L. Goldstein's Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. Bulla v. NealDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2024
  5. Williams v. Altimont Rental Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API