Legal Opinion
Reichelt v. Urban Investment & Development Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided June 27, 1985No. 83 C 5290PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BUA, District Judge.
I. FACTS
Plaintiff filed his original complaint against these defendants and others in August 1983. In it he alleged a breach of an implied warranty of habitability and a violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act. Plaintiff’s claim arose out of a defect in the foundation of a townhouse built by defendants in 1969 and purchased by the plaintiff in 1980. Plaintiff charges that these structural defects were caused by the defendants’ failure to properly construct the townhouse. In fact, he alleges that the defendants knew the house was built on highly compressible fill…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Edward R. POSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SKYLINE CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Whiting Stoker Co. v. Chicago Stoker CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
- Susmano v. ASSOC. INTERNISTS OF CHICAGOAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- 32 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 1077, 32 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,750 Air Line Stewards and Stewardesses Assoc., Local 550, Twu, Afl-Cio v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., Anne B. Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Public Relations Board, Inc. v. United Van Lines, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- May v. AndersonNevada Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re StoeckerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- General Electric Capital, Corp. v. Equifax Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- In Re HalkoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- Cell v. Barrow (In Re Barrow)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.