Katmailand, Inc. v. LAKE AND PENINSULA BORO.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Lake and Peninsula Borough (Borough) enacted and levied a license tax on guides and lodges. Several affected guides and lodges challenged the tax on a variety of constitutional grounds. The superior court granted summary judgment to the Borough. We affirm.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
The Lake and Peninsula Borough was incorporated as a home rule borough in April 1989. In August 1990 the Borough Assembly enacted an ordinance which imposed an annual permit fee of $750 on lodge operators and $250 on professional guides. 1 In March 1992 the Borough Assembly…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Regan v. Taxation With Representation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Madden v. Kentucky Ex Rel. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Brandon v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- State, Department of Revenue v. AndradeAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Heustess v. Kelley-HeustessAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- McCormick v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2000
- Cook v. BotelhoAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.