Elliott v. Chrysler Motors Corp.
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is an appeal from a summary judgment for the defendants in a suit for injunctive relief and damages. The plaintiffs assert an oral agreement for an automobile franchise with Chrysler Motors Corporation which, according to the plaintiffs’ understanding, was not to be performed within one year from *403the making thereof. Assuming the existence of such an oral agreement, the failure to comply with the statute of frauds would void it as to the defendant Chrysler Motors Corporation. NRS 111.220(1); Stanley v. Levy & Zentner Co., 60 Nev. 432, 112 P.2d 1047 (1941); Nehls v. Stock Farming…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Harmon v. Tanner Motor Tours of Nevada, Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 1963
- Stanley v. A. Levy & J. Zentner Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1941
- Nehls v. William Stock Farming Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1919
4Cited by2 opinions
- Kula v. Karat, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1975
- Grilz v. SanchezNevada Supreme Court · 2013