Legal Opinion

People v. DeWispelaere

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 10, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant argues that his convictions for burglary, second degree, and grand larceny, third degree, must be reversed because the testimony of his accomplice was not sufficiently corroborated. We disagree. The accomplice’s testimony was corroborated by the testimony of Gloria Kutterhoff that defendant was in possession of some guns, identified as the fruit of the burglary, soon after the event, and that defendant admitted to her that the guns were stolen. Although aspects of KutterhofFs testimony were inconsistent, it was not incredible as a matter of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. StromanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. People v. BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. ChristianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. In re Brian J. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. BeardsleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API