Legal Opinion

People v. Beardsley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 22, 1990Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant argues that his convictions for third degree burglary and first degree criminal possession of stolen property must be reversed because the testimony of his accomplice was not sufficiently corroborated. We disagree. The accomplice’s testimony was corroborated by the testimony of two witnesses. They testified that several of the items stolen in the burglary were stored in defendant’s apartment the day after the crimes were committed. This evidence connected defendant with the commission of the crimes in such a way that the jury could…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. DanielsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. People v. KressNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. People v. DeWispelaereAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API