Legal Opinion

People v. Brooks

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1974PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

We are called on to interpret the definition of accomplice now set forth in CPL 60.22 (subd. 2).

After a jury trial appellant was convicted of petit larceny for the theft of jewelry taken from a residence in the Woodsburgh section of Woodmere, Long Island. At the trial one Lo Monaco, a known receiver of stolen goods or ‘ ‘ fence ’ ’, to whom the police had been led by a confidential informer, appeared as a witness for the prosecution in exchange for a promise that he would not be prosecuted. He testified that in response to a telephone call concerning stolen property he went to appellant’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cabell v. MarkhamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  2. United States v. MoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Guiseppi v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  4. People v. . KupperschmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1924

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. People v. CabanNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. People v. BaschNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. FieldingNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. WernerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  5. People v. McAuliffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API