Legal Opinion

City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency v. Crockett

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 2001No. 27801, 27941, 29550PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*818OPINION

2Per curiam

At issue in these consolidated appeals is whether the Redevelopment Plan for the Downtown Las Vegas Redevelopment Area (the “Redevelopment Plan”) must be amended to include a project for redevelopment that contemplates vacating portions of four public streets and relocating a public park. Amendment is necessary only when the contemplated redevelopment actions materially deviate from or change the applicable redevelopment plan. Thus, we conclude that no amendment of the Redevelopment Plan was required in this instance because the vacation of the four streets and the relocation of the…

3Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Berman v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Moody v. Manny's Auto RepairNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Northern Nevada Ass'n of Injured Workers v. Nevada State Industrial Insurance SystemNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Fowler Irrevocable Trust 1992-1 v. City of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Horgan v. FeltonNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency v. PappasNevada Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Hantges v. City of HendersonNevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Moldon v. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  5. City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency v. PappasNevada Supreme Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API