Moldon v. County of Clark
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Douglas, J.:
In this appeal, we consider whether the placement of interest earned on condemnation funds, which were deposited with the court in an eminent domain action, into a local government’s general fund for public benefit, pursuant to statute, constituted a taking under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
We conclude that, because condemnation deposits constitute private property to the extent that a party is entitled to the condemnation deposit, the party is likewise entitled to the interest earned on that deposit. Thus, if interest…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Phillips v. Washington Legal FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Brown v. Legal Foundation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Zamora v. PriceNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Buhmann v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Whittington v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Buhmann v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Harry M. Whittington Mercedes B. Whittington Mercedes Gregg F/K/A Mercedes Whittington, Individually and as Trustee of the Margaret Lynn Puckett 1989 Trust// City of Austin v. City of Austin// Harry M. Whittington Mercedes B. Whittington Mercedes Gregg F/K/A Mercedes Whittington, Individually and as Trustee of the Margaret Lynn Puckett 1989 Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.