Legal Opinion

Moldon v. County of Clark

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 2008No. 47549PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Douglas, J.:

In this appeal, we consider whether the placement of interest earned on condemnation funds, which were deposited with the court in an eminent domain action, into a local government’s general fund for public benefit, pursuant to statute, constituted a taking under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

We conclude that, because condemnation deposits constitute private property to the extent that a party is entitled to the condemnation deposit, the party is likewise entitled to the interest earned on that deposit. Thus, if interest…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Phillips v. Washington Legal FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Brown v. Legal Foundation of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Zamora v. PriceNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Buhmann v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Whittington v. City of AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. Buhmann v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Harry M. Whittington Mercedes B. Whittington Mercedes Gregg F/K/A Mercedes Whittington, Individually and as Trustee of the Margaret Lynn Puckett 1989 Trust// City of Austin v. City of Austin// Harry M. Whittington Mercedes B. Whittington Mercedes Gregg F/K/A Mercedes Whittington, Individually and as Trustee of the Margaret Lynn Puckett 1989 Trust, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API