Legal Opinion
Cejka v. Vectrus Sys. Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided October 9, 2018No. Civil Action No. 15-cv-02418-MEHPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The evidence at trial was that Plaintiffs Walker and Wascher conflated resignation and termination, believing ultimately that the company simply intended to terminate them. Other employees testified consistent with this state of affairs. Particularly revealing was the testimony (upon cross examination by defense counsel) of Kelly Harris, a Vectrus employee who had been assigned first to Bagram and who then spent several years at Forward Operating Base Shank:
Q. In July 2014 your employment came to an end; right?
A. That's correct.
Q. And it came to an end because Fluor issued a descope; is that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Green v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Hansen v. Harper Excavating, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Tyler v. RE/MAX Mountain States, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Farrell v. Butler Transport, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2022
- Hilario Chavez v. The Santa Fe Public Schools Board of Education, Carmen Gonzales in her official capacity, Sarah Boses in her official capacity, Kate Noble in her official capacity, Roman Abeyta in his official capacity, Lynn Heffron in his official capacity, and Tony Ortiz in his official and individual capacitiesDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2026
- Montano v. Ricoh USA, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2020