Legal Opinion

Tomlanovich v. American Boston Mining Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1935No. Docket No. 59, Calendar No. 38,423PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Plaintiff was in defendants’ employ as a miner. Both were under the workmen’s compensation act. ' Plaintiff, claiming he sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment, was awarded compensation. Defendants have appealed.

Plaintiff and Joe Chartier worked together and were engaged in drilling incident to blasting the mine ore with dynamite. They were working in a small chamber about 8 by 10 feet, access to which was up through a 77-foot vertical shaft in which there was a ladder. Between 11 and 12 o’clock on May 15, 1931, the day of the alleged accident, these…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hajduk v. Revere Copper & Brass, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Derleth v. Roach & Seeber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Mauch v. Bennett & Brown Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Gumtow v. Kalamazoo Motor ExpressMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Herbert v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cazan v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API