Bilski v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WIENER, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners-Appellants Stanley and Connie Bilski appeal the judgment of the United States Tax Court (Tax Court), upholding the Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS’s) deficiency determination. The Bilskis contend that the Tax Court erred by holding that Treasury Form 872-A, Special Consent to Extend the Time To Assess Tax (872-A), is a waiver of the statute of limitations, and thus is not discharged in bankruptcy. They insist that an 872-A is an executory contract which, absent affirmance, is automatically rejected 60 days after the bankruptcy petition is filed. As we…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- McKnight v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Mark Buchine v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, Karen C. Buchine v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Dorothy D. McGee v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Harry Holof and Norma Holof v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- New York Guangdong Finance, Inc. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- C.R. England & Sons, Inc. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1996
- Estate of Greenfield v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2008