Mark Buchine v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, Karen C. Buchine v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REYNALDO G. GARZA, Circuit Judge:
Mark and Karen Buchine appeal a decision from the United States Tax Court holding them hable for tax deficiencies. We find that the Tax Court did not go beyond its statutorily prescribed jurisdiction by applying the equitable principle of reformation. We further find that the Tax Court did not clearly etr in finding that a written agreement existed between each of the Buchines and the IRS, and in finding that Karen Buchine was not an innocent spouse within the meaning of I.R.C. § 6013(e). Therefore, the decision of the Tax Court is AFFIRMED.
I. FACTS
Mark and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commissioner v. Gooch Milling & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bettye A. Sanders v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Commissioner v. McCoySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Woods v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
- Piarulle v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Kathryn Cheshire v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Flight Attendants Against Ual Offset (Faauo) and United Air Lines, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Rebecca Jo Reser v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Estate of Frank Branson, Deceased Mary M. March v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Estate of Hilda Ashman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.