Legal Opinion
Matter of Miller
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided March 7, 1997No. 53S00-9203-DI-164PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The Disciplinary Commission has charged the respondent, who was during relevant times a county prosecuting attorney, with assisting the cause of a civil plaintiff by investigating and prosecuting a concurrent criminal action against the civil defendant. Pursuant to Ind.Admission and Discipline Rule 28, Section 11(c), the parties have tendered to this Court an agreed resolution of the charges. That agreement is now before us for final approval.
The respondent was admitted to the bar of this state in 1980. The parties agree that in February 1987, a group of unit owners (the…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Kirtley v. McClellandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Matter of BukerIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
4Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Flatt-MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Bobby Dunn v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- Dunn v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
- In re Theodore Studdert-Kennedy / In re PRB-021-2022 (Office of Disciplinary Counsel)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2024
- People v. ChambersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.