Highland Plastics, Inc. v. Enders
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Dissent
SAETA, J., Dissenting.
My colleagues have decided that Code of Civil Procedure, section 1013, subdivision (a) (hereafter section 1013) does *Supp. 14not apply to notices terminating tenancies given under Civil Code, section 1946 (hereafter section 1946). I disagree with that conclusion. We all agree that if section 1013 applied, the lawsuit here was prematurely brought.
The 30-day notice was served by posting the notice on the premises and mailing a copy to the defendant. The action was commenced by the filing of the complaint on the 35th day after the mailing and posting of the notice. Section…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jordan v. TalbotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Colyear v. TobrinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Pesce v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Smith v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Melfi v. GoodmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.