Graybill v. De Young
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. Walter H. Linforth, and Linforth & Whitaker, for Appelpellant. !
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, C.
This is an action for libel. The plaintiff had a verdict and judgment in his favor for the sum of one dollar. The appeal is by the plaintiff from an order denying him a new trial.
The appellant contends that the order should be reversed because his challenge to William V. Bryan on his examination touching his qualifications to act as a juror was denied, and he was therefore compelled to exercise a peremptory challenge on said Bryan, and this is the ¡only point made for a reversal.
The challenge to Bryan was’upon the ground “that he is in a state of mind evincing bias against the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Baker v. BorelloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- McCarthy v. Cass Avenue & Fair Ground Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1887
- Quill v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924
- Burch v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1909
- Eaton v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
- Riley v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Simons v. JenningsMontana Supreme Court · 1935
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.