Quill v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
This action was instituted by plaintiff to recover damages against the defendant for negligently causing the death of his minor daughter. A verdict was rendered in favor of the defendant, and from the judgment which followed and from the order of the court denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial this appeal is prosecuted.
1. It is insisted that the court erred in denying plaintiff’s challenge for cause interposed to the jurors Parquharson and Borland. Plaintiff was compelled to use one of his peremptory challenges upon Parquharson, and had exhausted all of his peremptory challenges before…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Studer v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. WeilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Lawlor v. LinforthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hale v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Briggs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Atkeson v. Jackson EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Todd v. Orcutt.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Brown v. BeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.