Legal Opinion
Bruce Township v. Gout
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided November 21, 1994No. Docket 147123PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AFTER REMAND
Before: Michael J. Kelly, P.J., and Cavanagh and M. J. Shamo, * JJ. Cavanagh, J.
This case involves the definition of a public utility. Plaintiff Bruce Township appeals as of right from an order granting summary disposition in favor of defendants pursuant to MCR 2.116(0(10), no genuine issue of material fact. We affirm.
The pertinent facts are laid out as follows in our earlier opinion in this case:
Lakeville is the owner and operator of both a natural gas well located in Armada Township and a gas processing plant located in Addison Township. Plaintiff township is located between…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
- Muilenberg v. Upjohn Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- Poirier v. Grand Blanc TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Union Township v. City of Mount PleasantMichigan Supreme Court · 1968
- Taxpayers & Citizens in the Public Interest v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chapdelaine v. SochockiMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Michigan State AFL-CIO v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Afl-Cio v. Civ SerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- Audrey Leigh Andrus v. Celeste DunnMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- Reid Cowan v. State of MichiganMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.