Legal Opinion

Spiva v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 19, 1978No. Nos. M-77-232, M-77-233PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Floyd Spiva, Jr., and Gerald Martin, hereinafter referred to as defendants, were charged, tried, and convicted in the District Court, Oklahoma County, Cases No. CRM— 76-3251 and CRM — 76-3262, of the offense of Unlawful Possession of Dental Equipment, to wit, Two Dental Chairs, in violation of 59 O.S.1971, § 328.39. From that conviction and a One Thousand ($1,000.00) Dollar fine, the defendants have appealed to this Court.

It is the opinion of this Court that the State failed to establish essential ele*1357ments of the crime charged. Title 59 O.S. 1971, § 328.39, provides in part that:

“It…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Thrasher v. Board of GovernorsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  3. Cude v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Board of Governors of the Registered Dentists v. BurkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  5. Bristow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sitsler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API