Smith v. Brink
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Judge:
This appeal from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County presents an opportunity to explain the doctrine of election of remedies as it applies to a plaintiffs choice of pursuing a contract action for breach of a settlement agreement or litigating the underlying claim. Applying the doctrine of election of remedies, the lower court herein sustained the appellees’ demurrer and dismissed the appellants’ complaint alleging breach of a settlement agreement by the appellees. Though we find that the trial court’s reliance on the doctrine of election of remedies was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Cantwell v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Karns v. Tony Vitale Fireworks Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. District 5, United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- E-Z Parks, Inc. v. Philadelphia Parking AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Jones v. P.M.A. InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Baker v. Cambridge Chase, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- McCausland v. WagnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Composition Roofers Local 30/30B v. KatzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Crown Coal & Coke Co. v. Powhatan Mid-Vol Coal Sales, L.L.C.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Neshaminy School District v. Neshaminy Federation of TeachersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.