Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In re the Arbitration between Ladin & D. & C. Textile Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 21, 1963Published

1Concurrence

Eager, J. (concurring).

I would affirm. I do not, however, concur fully in the reasoning of the majority, and, consequently, deem it necessary to state my grounds for affirming the order which denied a stay of arbitration.

Clearly, the Supreme Court has no inherent power, on summary application, to enjoin or stay an arbitration proceeding. Such a proceeding, in and of itself, is not a special proceeding-subject to the general control and jurisdiction of the court. In fact, the former provisions of the Civil Practice Act (§ 1459) designating such a proceeding as a special proceeding were omitted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Flash v. GoldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  2. In re the Arbitration between Harris & East India Trading Co.New York Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Bartley Bros. Construction Corp. v. National Surety Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  4. In re the Arbitration between Leonard & HeinemannNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Gutchen v. DembitzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API