Flash v. Goldman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action based upon the alleged destruction of plaintiff’s rights under a contract, as amended, entered into between plaintiff and the defendant Goldman, plaintiff appeals from an order which stays all proceedings in the action, as against respondent, until arbitration shall have been had in accordance with the terms of the afore-mentioned contract. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The defendant Goldman has been granted a stay of the action pending arbitration. (See Matter of Goldman [Flash], post, p. 830, decided herewith.) While respondent is not a party to the…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Post Tensioned Engineering Corp. v. Fairways Plaza AssociatesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Dot's Boulevard Corp. v. RosenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Starr v. O'RourkeNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Bartley Bros. Construction Corp. v. National Surety Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Corbetta Construction Co. v. George F. Driscoll Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.