In re the Arbitration between Harris & East India Trading Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMorris Eder, J.
Respondent moves to confirm the Referee’s report recommending that petitioner’s motions to vacate the arbitration awards be denied. The Referee conducted extensive hearings on the facts of the basic transaction as well as the conduct of the arbitration proceedings and concluded that petitioner had failed to sustain any of the grounds asserted for vacatur of the awards.
We need not dwell upon the claim of misconduct, as the evidence fully supports the finding that it was not substantiated and that petitioner’s rights were not prejudiced by any of the acts or procedure adopted by the arbitrators.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Finsilver, Still & Moss, Inc. v. Goldberg, Maas & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commerce & Industry Insurance v. NesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- In re the Arbitration between Hellman & WolbromAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- In re the Arbitration between Leonard & HeinemannNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Bevona v. ValenciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re Arbitration between Microtran Co. & EdelsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.