Legal Opinion

Wright v. Eastman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 22, 2013PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

WECHT, J.

Catherine Wright (“Appellant”), individually and on behalf of the estate of Patricia Carlin (“Decedent”), challenges the trial court order of December 1, 2011. That order granted summary judgment to Paul and Marion Eastman (“Appellee”).1 We reverse and remand.

*283We begin by reproducing the trial court’s opinion in its entirety:

[Appellant] has appealed from the Order of Court granting [Appellee’s] Motion for Summary Judgment in the above matter. The evidence established that decedent was struck by a motor vehicle driven by [Appellee], who was traveling home from work in the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Murphy v. Duquesne University of Holy GhostSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Toy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Summers v. CERTAINTEED CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Thompson v. GinkelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Marion, D. v. Bryn Mawr Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. Yorty v. PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Sabo v. UPMC AltoonaDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Moranko, F. v. Downs RacingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API