Legal Opinion

Wolley v. Chapman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 13, 1928No. 26,384PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Plaintiff had a verdict of $2,500 for malicious prosecution, and defendants appeal from the order denying their alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.

Defendant Chapman is sued because of his activities as the agent of his codefendant, the A. Y. McDonald Manufacturing Company, a dealer in plumbing supplies. Plaintiff is a plumber, formerly plying his trade in Minneapolis. In September, 1923, he had been a customer of the McDonald company for some time and was then owing them a substantial sum on open account. He then purchased substantially $200 worth of materials to be installed in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Drum v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  2. Drum v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Grimestad v. LofgrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Borak v. H. E. Westerman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Foster v. SchmahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Morgan v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Hallen v. Montgomery Ward Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API