Wolley v. Chapman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Plaintiff had a verdict of $2,500 for malicious prosecution, and defendants appeal from the order denying their alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.
Defendant Chapman is sued because of his activities as the agent of his codefendant, the A. Y. McDonald Manufacturing Company, a dealer in plumbing supplies. Plaintiff is a plumber, formerly plying his trade in Minneapolis. In September, 1923, he had been a customer of the McDonald company for some time and was then owing them a substantial sum on open account. He then purchased substantially $200 worth of materials to be installed in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Drum v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Drum v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Grimestad v. LofgrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
3Cited by4 opinions
- Borak v. H. E. Westerman Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Foster v. SchmahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Morgan v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Hallen v. Montgomery Ward Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938