Legal Opinion

Hallen v. Montgomery Ward Co. Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 9, 1938No. 31,687PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

In this action for false arrest and malicious prosecution plaintiff had a verdict for $3,985. Defendants moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial. The court denied judgment but granted a new trial unless plaintiff consented to reduce the verdict to $2,000. Plaintiff consented, and defendants appeal.

Plaintiff’s testimony, virtually Avliolly uncorroborated, made a case for the jury. But a careful consideration of the whole record is so convincing that defendants proved not only probable cause, but good cause, for plaintiff’s apprehension and prosecution for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roemer v. Jacob Schmidt Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. Price v. Minnesota, Dakota & Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Sticha v. BenzickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. Risch v. JensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  5. Wallerick v. McGill-Warner Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Parrish v. PeoplesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  2. McHardy v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Bethany Fellowship, Inc. v. MurkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API