Legal Opinion

Jennewein v. CITY COUNCIL OF CITY OF WILMINGTON

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 15, 1980No. 795SC926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

The order from which both petitioners and respondents have attempted to appeal is interlocutory. An appeal does not lie from an interlocutory order unless it affects some substantial right of the appellant and will work an injury to him if not corrected before an appeal from the final judgment. Industries, Inc. v. Insurance Co., 296 N.C. 486, 251 S.E. 2d 443 (1979); Veazey v. Durham, 231 N.C. 357, 57 S.E. 2d 377 (1950); Leak v. Covington, 95 N.C. 193 (1886); Auction Co. v. Myers, 40 N.C. App. 570, 253 S.E. 2d 362 (1979). The order in the present case remanded the case to the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Tridyn Industries, Inc. v. American Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Godley Auction Co., Inc. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Leak v. . CovingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Akers v. City of Mount AiryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. High Rock Lake Partners, LLC v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Coates v. Durham Cty.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  5. Heritage Pointe Builders, Inc. v. North Carolina Licensing Board of General ContractorsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API