Legal Opinion

Welch v. Sargent

California Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1899No. Sac. No. 691PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County and from an order denying a new trial. Edward I. Jones, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

This is an equitable action brought/by a creditor of the Stockton Combined Harvester and Agricultural Works, a corporation, and to obtain a judgment against certain stockholders therein to the extent of the unpaid balance due from them on their subscription to the capital stock of said defendant corporation; to have certain transfers of stock, alleged to Imve been fraudulently made, declared illegal, the transfers canceled, and that judgment be entered against the transferrers. General relief is also asked. The pleadings are multitudinous and present many phases all grouping around…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hatch v. DanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Baines v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Mathis v. Pridham, ReceiverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1892
  5. Harmon v. PageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Spencer v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. BelcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Andrews v. State Ex Rel. BlairOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  4. In re PutmanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1911
  5. Kaye v. MetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API