Hedrick v. Tabbert
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAILEY, J.
Case Summary
Appellants-Plaintiffs Donald E. Hedrick and John K. Snyder (“Hedrick and Snyder”) appeal the decision of the trial court granting partial summary judgment in favor of Appellees-Defendants Don A. Tab-bert and the law firm of Tabbert, Hahn, Kempf, McKinley & Zanetis, P.C. (collectively “Tabbert”) in a legal malpractice action. We affirm.
Issue
Hedrick and Snyder present the following issue for review:
Whether the trial court erred when it granted Tabbert’s motion for partial summary judgment.1
Facts/Procedural History
The facts most favorable to the nonmov-ing party are…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Rice v. StrunkIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Picadilly, Inc. v. RaikosIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Holloway v. Bob Evans Farms, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Sanders v. TownsendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Shambaugh & Son, Inc. v. CarlisleIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Godby v. WhiteheadIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Price v. FreelandIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
- Sequa Coatings Corp. v. Northern Indiana Commuter Transportation DistrictIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Sparks v. WhiteIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.