Legal Opinion

Celluloid Manuf'g Co. v. Cellonite Manuf'g Co.

United States Circuit Court

Decided July 12, 1887PublishedCited by 45 opinions

Motion for Preliminary Injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

Bradley, Justice.

The bill of complaint in this case states that the complainant was incorporated under the laws of New York in 1871, and has ever since that time used its corporate name in carrying on its business of the manufacture and sale of various compounds of pyroxyline, adapted to different uses and purposes, and that its name has become of great consequence in the good-will of its business, its standing, and the reputation of its goods; that, in order to designate its said manufactured product, and to distinguish it from similar compounds manufactured by others, the complainant, from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Selchow v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1883

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. DuPont Cellophane Co. v. Waxed Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  2. Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. The Children's Bootery v. SutkerSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  4. Purcell v. SummersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  5. Quaker State Oil Refining Co. v. SteinbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API