Legal Opinion
Arenofsky v. Arenofsky
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 7, 1954PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
29 N.J. Super. 209 (1954)
102 A.2d 101
SHIRLEY ARENOFSKY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
BARNEY ARENOFSKY, EXECUTOR OF THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF DAVID ARENOFSKY, DECEASED, HAROLD ARENOFSKY, BARNEY ARENOFSKY, LOUIS ARENOFSKY AND HYMAN ARENOFSKY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 23, 1953.
Decided January 7, 1954.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and FRANCIS.
Mr. Sydney Isadore Turtz argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Cohen & Turtz, attorneys).
Mr. Maurice C. Brigadier argued the cause for the appellants (Mr. Joseph Moritz, attorney).
The…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- President of the Manhattan Co. v. ArmourSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Gerlach EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- In re the Settlement of the Estate of CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
- Chase National Bank v. DeichmillerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Frelinghuysen v. Town of MorristownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Pepka v. BranchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
- First National Bank & Trust Co. of Wyoming v. FinkbinerWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
- White v. WhiteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- In Re Estate of HallNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Wyckoff v. Young Women's Christian Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.