City of Wilmington v. North Carolina Natural Gas Corp.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Plaintiff asserts that the trial court erred by granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment based on defendant’s third, fourth, fifth, and eighth defenses in its answer. After careful review of the record, we affirm. We will separately address each defense on which the trial court granted summary judgment.
First, we review the standard for granting a summary judgment motion. A court grants a motion for summary judgment when “the evidence before the court demonstrates that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that a party is entitled to a judgment as a matter…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hill v. Carolina Freight Carriers Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Kirkpatrick & Associates, Inc. v. Wickes Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- New River Crushed Stone, Inc. v. Austin Powder Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hoisington v. ZT-Winston-Salem AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- One Beacon Insurance v. United Mechanical Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Ogden Plant Maintenance Co. of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Hanover InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2000
- Hyatt v. Mini Storage on the GreenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.