Legal Opinion

Brown v. Cain Chemical, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided August 6, 1992No. 01-91-00097-CVPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANK C. PRICE, Assigned Justice.

Charles Brown brought suit on a letter agreement for employment with Cain Chemical, Inc. (Cain). Cain plead a general denial and filed a motion for summary judgment on the basis of a valid release. The trial court granted the motion. In a single point of error, Brown asserts there are material issues of fact precluding summary judgment.

In a letter agreement dated April 7,1987, Cain confirmed an offer of employment to Charles Brown. Cain’s letter offered in pertinent part:

You will have responsibility for Cain Chemical’s MIS function and will report…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Swilley v. HughesTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  5. " MOORE" BURGER, INC. v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Wright v. Sydow, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  2. King v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Lee v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. HRN, Inc. v. Shell Oil Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  5. Burd v. ArmisteadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API