Legal Opinion
United States v. Shvarts
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 1, 2000No. 1:99-cr-00372PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge.
The defendants have moved the Court for an order that would (1) suppress all evidence obtained through an investigation conducted by the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”) alleging that such evidence was obtained in violation of their Fourth Amendment rights; (2) dismiss Count Five for the reason that is exceeds the intended reach of the money laundering statute; (3) require the government to elect between money laundering objects; (4) require the government to proffer the propriety of venue for Count Five; (5) compel the government…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- D.L. Cromwell Investments, Inc., Lloyd Bierne, David S. Davidson, Eric S. Thomas, and Matthew Greenwald v. Nasd Regulation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Diaz v. Washington State Migrant CouncilCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Marchiano v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- United States v. VondetteDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. v. Torchmark Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.