Legal Opinion

D.L. Cromwell Investments, Inc., Lloyd Bierne, David S. Davidson, Eric S. Thomas, and Matthew Greenwald v. Nasd Regulation, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 1, 2002No. Docket 01-7301PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants D.L. Cromwell Investments, Inc. (“Cromwell”) and individual Cromwell employees, all members of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (“NASD”), have been the subject of ongoing investigations both by NASD Regulation, Inc. (“Regulation”), which is an investigatory arm of the NASD, and by federal prosecutors. They have sued to enjoin NASD Regulation from compelling them — under threat of sanctions authorized by NASD Rule 8210 — to submit to on-the-record interviews, arguing that NASD Regulation is a willing tool of the prosecutors and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Paul Jolly v. Thomas Coughlin, Robert Greifinger, John P. Keane, C. Greiner, S. KapoorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Perpetual Securities, Inc. v. Julie Tang and Hua Yu ChenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. SteinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  3. Fiero v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  4. Gilman v. Marsh & McLennan CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  5. Diaz v. Washington State Migrant CouncilCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API