Legal Opinion

Hunt v. Marine Midland Bank Central

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 1974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas Aloi, J.

Defendants move for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212 upon .the grounds that plaintiff’s complaint and accompanying moving papers raise no triable issue of fact, *330and that therefore as a matter of law their respective motions should be granted. Plaintiff has moved to dismiss defendants’ motions upon the (grounds that section 9-503 of the Uniform Commercial 'Code, which authorized defendant Marine Midland Bank to repossess her car is unconstitutional as it denies her due process of law as guaranteed Iby the Fourteenth Amendment of the United ¡States Constitution. In the interest of fully…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Davison v. KlaessNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Kaufman v. Simons Motor Sales Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Global Casting Industries, Inc. v. Daley-Hodkin Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Crouse v. First Trust Union BankNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Rudolf v. FC Marine Repair, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API