Legal Opinion
Trounstine v. Bauer, Pogue & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 31, 1942PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this suit for an accounting of certain transactions of the defendants in the stock of Fidelio Brewery, Inc., which, it is alleged, was to be dealt in for the joint benefit of Norman S. Goldberger, her testator, and the defendants. The amended complaint sets out two causes of action, the first upon an alleged oral agreement claimed to have been entered into on or shortly prior to June 8, 1933, between the defendant corporation acting through the individual defendants Bauer and Pogue, the latter since deceased, and the second upon an alleged written…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Kimberly v. ArmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Orient Insurance v. DaggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Arrowsmith v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Harvey B. Johnson v. Rac CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- Johnson v. Helicopter & Airplane Services Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
- Trounstine v. Bauer, Pogue & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- International Pulp Equipment Co. v. St. Regis Kraft Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.