Legal Opinion
United States v. Jimenez
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided September 12, 2006No. 04-51225PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge:
Defendant-Appellant Michelle Jimenez (“Jimenez”) appeals her convictions for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 500 grams or more, but less than five kilograms, of cocaine and aiding and abetting possession with intent to distribute that amount. Jimenez argues that the district court violated her Sixth Amendment right to confront and cross-examine witnesses by not allowing her to ask Government witness San Antonio Police Department Narcotics Unit Officer Valentine Lopez (“Lopez”) where specifically he was located when he allegedly observed Jimenez…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Juan Baptista-Rodriguez, Ramon Calvo, and Julio R. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. HittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. SkeltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. John TumaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Humberto Duron-CalderaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.