Legal Opinion

Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided January 3, 1955No. Civ. No. 6957PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYNNE, Chief Judge.

On November 25, 1951, defendant’s railroad train, the Crescent, normally running between Montgomery and New ■Orleans over its own rails, was proceeding southbound at Woodstock, Alabama, ■over the plaintiff's tracks, due to a detour caused by a damaged trestle on defendant’s line. The detour was made under an arrangement ruled by a written Detour Agreement between the parties. Such train was being operated by plaintiff’s employees, and defendant had only one employee thereon, who was there solely for the purpose of keeping a record of the tickets for interline accounting.…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. VoigtSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Kulukundis Shipping Co. v. Amtorg Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  4. Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  5. Colby v. KluneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. The Alabama Great Southern Railroad Company v. Louisville and Nashville Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  2. Warner v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. McNeilab, Inc. v. North River InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1986
  4. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  5. Chicago Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API