Legal Opinion
Kipnis v. Baram
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided December 3, 1996No. 96 C 2910Published
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CASTILLO, District Judge.
Presently pending before the Court is defendant David Baram’s motion to dismiss plaintiff Kenneth Kipnis’ amended complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1 The Court has previously advised the parties that it would convert the motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment, as provided for in Rule 12(c). After due consideration of the parties’ submissions, we grant summary judgment in favor of the defendant.
RELEVANT FACTS
Kipnis works in the Chicago regional office of the General Services…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ernest L. Crady v. Liberty National Bank and Trust Company of Indiana, Steve Richards, Branch Administrator, and Jack Ragland, Chief Executive OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Ralph C. SHAGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UPJOHN COMPANY and Asgrow Seed Company, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.