State v. Dean
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
{¶ 1} This case involves a defendant’s Sixth Amendment request to represent himself, which was denied by the trial judge because the request was viewed as involuntary. Yet the trial judge’s bias against and threats to defense counsel created the involuntary nature of defendant’s choice. Counsel stated that they could no longer fully represent their client because the judge had made statements against them. This unusual conundrum had caused counsel to be apprehensive, anxious, and preoccupied over the judge’s intentions. However, the judge refused to allow them to withdraw from the case. The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. LaMarOhio Supreme Court · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- State v. Dean (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Neyland (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. Obermiller (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. Jackson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. Osie (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.