Legal Opinion
Lauer v. Williams
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 23, 1917No. Civ. No. 1408PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is an action for the foreclosure of a mortgage executed by the defendant, C. O. Williams, to the plaintiff, to secure the payment of a promissory note made and delivered to the plaintiff by said Williams.
The defendant, Harter, although duly served with process, did not answer the complaint or otherwise make an appearance.
The findings were in favor of the plaintiff. As to the defendant, Harter, the court found that he had, subsequently to' the execution of the mortgage, purchased the premises described therein and in the complaint, and that the “claim and interest of the said J. P. Harter…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Giselman v. StarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Lewis v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Walker v. McCuskerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Corcoran v. DollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Ray v. BorgfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- First State Bank v. MussigbrodMontana Supreme Court · 1928
- Brichetto v. RaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- McIntyre v. HicksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Walter J. Warren Insurance Agency v. Surpur Timber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Denovan v. Golden State Woolen MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930