Legal Opinion

Denovan v. Golden State Woolen Mills

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1930No. Docket No. 7274PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants to obtain a decree rescinding a contract of purchase of 3,333 shares of the capital stock of the defendant corporation. The defendants answered and a trial was had before the court sitting without a jury. The court made findings in favor of the plaintiff and from a judgment entered thereon the defendants have appealed and have brought up a hill of exceptions.

1. The defendants claim that the material findings on the allegations of fraud were not sustained by the evidence. Among other things the following facts stand out prominently.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Munson v. FishburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Wikstrom v. Yolo Fliers ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Lauer v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. Giovannoni v. BartmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Commissioners of the Land Office v. Cities Service Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
  2. Dunn v. StringerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Farrell v. Miramar Hotel Co., Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API