Legal Opinion

City of Myrtle Beach v. Parker

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 5, 1973No. 19629PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bussey, Justice:

In this action, commenced on November 14, 1970, the appellant city sought to have the court determine its rights in a portion of Spivey Beach Road, which traverses an area in Myrtle Beach occupied by the respondent Grand Strand Amusement Park (“Strand”) leased from respondent Horry Land and Improvement Company. The respondent Business Assistance Corporation of Panama City, Florida, is assignee of Strand’s lease as security for an indebtedness. Respondent Parker is president of Strand. Appellant city asserts that it has been denied access to the aforesaid portion of Spivey…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Webb v. City of DemopolisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. Chafee v. City of AikenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  3. OUTLAW v. MoiseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  4. Crocker v. CollinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
  5. Bethel Methodist Episcopal Church v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hoogenboom v. City of BeaufortCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  2. K & a Acquisition Group, LLC v. Island Pointe, LLCSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. South Carolina State Highway Department v. MettsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978
  4. Town of Sullivans Island v. ByrumCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1992
  5. Ingram v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API