Legal Opinion
Gadda v. State Bar of Cal.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 27, 2007No. 06-15344PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEEZER, Circuit Judge:
Miguel Gadda (“Gadda”) appeals, pro se, the district court’s order granting defendants’ motions to dismiss and for judgment on the pleadings. Because the retroactive application of the 2003 amendment to section 6080.10 of the California Business and Professions Code violates neither the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment nor the Ex Post Facto Clause, we affirm.
I
Gadda was admitted to the California State Bar (“the Bar”) in 1975. He became a member of the bar of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, the United States Court of…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Alphonso Thompson v. The Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles, a Public CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- General Motors Corp. v. RomeinSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Stormans, Inc. v. SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- McLean v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
- Stormans Inc v. John WiesmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Surowiec v. Capital Title Agency, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2011
- Stormans, Inc. v. SeleckyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.