Legal Opinion

Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1967No. Nos. 40257 and 40258PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The primary question raised by appellants is whether under Section 4921.10, Revised Code, they should have been given a reasonable time to provide the service in question before a new certificate was granted.

Section 4921.10, Revised Code, provides in part:

“On a finding by the commission that any motor transportation company does not give convenient and necessary service in accordance with the order of such commission, such motor transportation company shall be given a reasonable time, not less than sixty days, to provide such service before any existing certificate is canceled or a new…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. H. & K. Motor Transportation, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Central Ohio Transit Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Columbus, Delaware & Marion Electric Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1927
  4. D. G. & U. Truck Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ohio Bus Line, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API