Legal Opinion

State v. Peralto

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 2001No. 21788, 21794PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

NAKAYAMA, J.

Defendants-appellants Monica Alves Peral-to (Monica) and Mitchell Peralto (Mitchell) appeal them convictions of one count of kidnapping, in violation of Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 707-720 (1993), and one count of murder in the second degree, in violation of HRS § 707-701.5 (1993), their extended term sentences of life imprisonment with the possibility of parole under HRS §§ 706-661 and 706-662 (Supp.1999), and their enhanced sentences of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole under HRS § 706-657 (Supp.1999). On appeal, Monica argues that…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Proffitt v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Maynard v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Sochor v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. MaugaotegaHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. JessHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. KetchumHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. YamadaHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. KEOHOKAPUHawaii Supreme Court · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API